How to Fix the Google Adsense “Deceptive Site Navigation” Warning


One way to fix broken links.

One way to fix broken links.

About two weeks ago I got this warning from Google, that one or more of my sites is in violation of Google Adsense policies and I must comply with guidelines within three days or remove their ads from my pages. Google always pisses me off so the first thing I did, at 5:30 a.m. because I couldn’t sleep, was to take all their ads down.

After doing some research, when I wasn’t just railing to myself about how these bastards think they can tell me how to write and what to do, I discovered that is a good thing to take down your Google ads if you get this warning. If you aren’t running their ads and can’t meet their guidelines, it prevents them from simply suspending your account.

Google hasn’t made any money for me since they revised their guidelines and decided to stop supporting independent websites like mine. Google wants to control everything including web page layout, background color and type font. Now their big push is for sites to evolve for display on smartphones. I don’t write for smartphones. I’m old enough to remember books.

Google says their guidelines promote quality content and that if you write original content of good quality you will get page rank. I have found that good sites with real information usually don’t run Google ads. Google page rank means either that you are the only one writing about “How to Kill a Mountain Lion with Your Bare Hands” or, you make lots of money for Google. If you make lots of money for Google they will try to clear out your competition.

Well, shoot, it still wouldn't pass a Demand Studios editor, but yes, active tense! Charles Dickens! Stop that passive tense bullshit, everyone knows good writing is active tense!

Well, shoot, it still wouldn’t pass a Demand Studios editor, but yes, active tense! Charles Dickens! Stop that passive tense bullshit, everyone knows good writing is active tense! “It was the best of times” just won’t cut it at Demand. Where are your references, Chuck? Why should anyone think you are an expert?

Obviously I don’t like Google, Alice and I were both starting to do well as internet writers back when the internet was still a frontier society and everyone was on equal footing. Then Google became the equivalent of a railroad baron and things abruptly changed. That’s water under the bridge now, but I am incensed that at this late date, when I am completely over this, when I haven’t had a payout from Google for three years and made an average of two cents a day from their ads during that time, they think they have the right to tell me what to do. One of the most infuriating things about this is that they don’t even define what is actually wrong. “Deceptive site navigation” in my case probably means broken links. Well, I write about odd things, and I’m sure that in some of my old articles there are links to free downloads that aren’t there any more and probably here and there are links to some of my old pages that were attacked by hackers a few years ago and aren’t available any longer. I have a lot of material online just in this one blog, the only site I have left, and I’m busy. I actually go outside the house and do things. I have no time to fix all of that. “Deceptive site navigation” could also mean that I have gateway pages with lists of articles to which I provide links, such as my Commentary or Axe page do. (Look up top, they are in the blog menu). Google doesn’t like this. I don’t care what Google likes.

I think that even old articles with broken links do have some value. I might re-publish some of the work I did take offline and link to that, but I’m reluctant to invest much time in it since my good material gets stolen quite often and there’s really no recourse to this. Writing is a whole new game in this day and age and I’m a retired Vietnam vet who would rather grow vegetables and go fishing and tinker with my real world projects, than to spend my days fixing links and prowling the internet for copyright violations, which will of course lower my Google page rank if I don’t fight them and demand they take it down.

Reading about the experiences of others who received this same warning about deceptive site navigation has been at least entertaining. Many people were panicking because they didn’t understand what it meant, and on the Help forum the experts were suggesting that maybe they should just redo their entire sites and publish entirely new material. People who don’t write for a living do think that writing requires neither time nor effort. Writers don’t actually produce anything, in the non-writer’s way of thinking, it’s just a mysterious gift. Cripes, my sister Patty thought I could ride in the back seat of their car from here to Texas and still make a living! You just cross your arms and wiggle your nose and blink and that’s an article! That’s just crazy. Writing eats up your whole life if you let it grab ahold of you. A website like mine represents years of work, and it would take years to replace it with new material in a new format. I see no point in doing that, I go back and read my old stuff from time to time and I still find little errors and things I can add, but I don’t disagree with what I said. If it was crap, I’d have taken it down ages ago. Yes, my tirade about sleeping bags was more than a little windy and incoherent, but I was really drunk that night. Sometimes when I wrote for Demand Studios the only way I could follow guidelines was by drinking a lot, alcohol is a mainstay for writers.

Perfect example of the best way to deal with Google. Keep it short.

Perfect example of the best way to deal with Google. Keep it short. OK, she was probably a little drunk. Spelling was off a bit.

After checking out the guideline advice sections, I realize that Google could have banned me from Adsense for all sorts of reasons. I feel free to digress from the original topic of my blog, whatever that was, and to talk about anything I want. Google does not approve of digression. Everything has to be on topic. I’ve been booted off many forums for being off topic and I no longer visit forums. Google can’t boot me off my own blog.

Google doesn’t allow sites to speak of certain things, and one way to find out if your site is in compliance is to run a site search for banned keywords, like “rifle” or “fighting knife” or “gambling.” I wonder if it would matter if I wrote about rifling through old files, or gambling that the Church sermon would begin on time, or fighting to find my pocket knife, where did I put that thing? While Google doesn’t allow people to write about such things, anywhere on the domain registered with Google Adsense, or even allow you to link to pages with such content, Google will of course sell ads to companies who sell rifles and fighting knives or promote online or casino gambling. Recently Google Adsense even suggested I approve gambling ads for my site. The Google Adsense program is slanted very heavily towards revenue for Google. Those ads about those banned topics would show up on any pages I pulled up online, if they ran Google ads and I’d written about the topics in open gmail or even just searched for them on Amazon through the Chrome browser. They would even have showed up on my own site if I looked at my own pages, where I couldn’t talk about such things. Well, I did, a little. OK, well, frequently. I will do more of it now that I’m clear of Google restrictions. I know a lot about fighting knives and rifles. Well, I also know a lot about shovels, I know about the fundamental military things. Google said I can’t write about those things but I have and I will. In the WWI trenches the entrenching tool was favored over the bayonet and the Russian Army actually issues fighting shovels to their Spetsnaz soldiers. Fighting shovels! Take that! you Google bastards!

So much about Google’s policy guidelines is unfair that I wonder why they are even legal. Google Chrome won’t allow viewing of streaming video on Veetle, for example, and technically that isn’t a copyright violation. It’s like sharing what you see on your tv with friends. I like Veetle so I watch it on Mozilla Firefox. Many of my favorite old movies, like “Kelly’s Heroes” or “Zulu!”, play there regularly. Zulu! with Michael Caine is usually available on demand at YouTube, now owned by Google, even though that really is an illegal copyright violation and they take copies down in response to complaints, at the same moment they allow new copies to upload. I haven’t looked for Kelly’s Heroes there because I know the story by heart and on Veetle I can just step into the movie at any point and pick the dialogue up, like I’m Kelly or Big Joe or Crap Game or Oddball. I know this movie by heart. When I was in the Army during the Vietnam years, Kelly’s Heroes literally played at every post theater everywhere I was stationed, again and again and again, and I watched it over and over and over and over. Kelly’s Heroes was even the in-flight move on the Flying Tiger Airlines jet that brought me home.

Oops! I have digressed from the original marketing theory of my blog, that is another violation of Google Adsense policy. Oh, “Zulu!” is such a good movie, an accurate depiction of a genuine historical event, with both sides portrayed fairly and with respect. But again, I digress and this is banned by Google.

I could go on, but there’s no point in complaining about Google. The big guys will fall, and Google is no different. Search engines like Startpage give better results without tracking your activities and selling the info. Hushmail gives you encrypted email for free that Gmail can’t hack to apply to targeted ads. Mozilla Firefox lets you watch both Veetle and YouTube! There are many alternatives to Google and I use them. I haven’t used Google Search for years.

If you do want to help with the dumbing down of America and the world beyond us, please cooperate with Google and limit your activities to things that fit on a smartphone. It’s the fastest way to guarantee our transition to the world of Idiocracy.

Sigh, looking back I see way too many links, this also reduces page rank. But! tomorrow morning I will go fishing!

My final action on this was to exit the Adsense program. I closed my account and now they owe me money.

Resolving the Skipping Play List Issue on Spotify

Dang! I need to clean the desk but it won't happen. Tools for this fix were very simple, scotch tape not shown. The parts lying about were not needed.

Dang! I need to clean the desk but it won’t happen. Tools for this fix were very simple, scotch tape not shown. The parts lying about were not needed. Oh, you only need the abacus if the power goes out.

Today after I finished my emails I punched up Spotify and got the dreaded Song Will Not Play error. Instead of running through the play list song by song with a few ads that aren’t really terrible mixed in, Spotify told me nothing was available! But! But! I thought this was free! so I started poking about to see what was happening and found this advice:

Windows] Player skips through playlist and will not play music

Which of course, after an hour of tinkering with Windows and verifying that this or that works, did not help. This is normal, usually no help information associated with Windows does help and Spotify did not go beyond this level. Windows did tell me something was disconnected, but I checked everything and nothing was. Hmm.

For a couple of years the speaker system I use has had a control problem, there’s a wired volume control and mute button that is getting old and scratchy so I’ve been dealing with this by setting it just precisely so and propping it on a wad of crumpled paper and remembering not to touch it. Today I guess it failed on one half of the stereo system and Windows could just not deal with this and accused everyone involved of either being the problem or working properly. Windows troubleshooting system does this a lot, should have a finger that points at things and yells “It’s not us!” because that’s all the help Windows Troubleshooting has ever been to me. After unplugging things and hearing pops and testing different programs I decided it was time to deal with the real problem, that little basic remote control that I never really need. It was the only clearly faulty thing I could find.

In the 70’s when I worked as an electronic technician, a scratchy “pot” was one of the most common faults we found, because unlike many electronic components, a pot is mechanical. It’s essential a little carbon-coated disc that a stylus rides upon. The more of the disc you use in the circuit, by moving the stylus upwards on the disc, the higher the resistance. So that is the basic analog volume control. It wears out. The carbon path wears away, the stylus corrodes, and the pot gets scratchy and then fails. Pots cost like twenty cents, but if you want a replacement it can actually cost you forty dollars, I worked for a company that actually did that to people.

Today I opened up the remote, which was so ancient that it was held together by two philips screws instead of being plastic welded together so you can’t get into it, and because I didn’t see anything fancy in there I clipped the wires on both sides and reconnected them, matching color to color, and threw the control circuit into the garbage. Now everything works fine. I have stereo and wonderful sound effects and I can listen once again to the soundtrack from The Civil War as narrated by Ken Burns, until tears come to my eyes and I feel the urge to play the flute (a dizi I acquired on one of my mysterious excursions in Thailand).