Taking a Break While the World Changes
avatar

garden trellises of willow polesI read in an archaeology book once that you can gauge the age and prosperity of a civilization by the amount of garbage it produces. Young civilizations in the expansion years squander resources quickly and generate huge piles of garbage. Old civilizations, short on resources and about to morph into something new, generate very little garbage. Garbage gets used again instead of being thrown out.

While my little homestead doesn’t reflect the American civilization in general, for the past couple of years I’ve produced very little garbage. In fact, one of the first expenses I eliminated when times got hard was the garbage pickup. I don’t have much garbage. I take recyclables to the dump myself, and there really isn’t much other stuff that won’t turn into compost eventually.

That same kind of attitude, that even inexpensive things have greater value now, gets reflected in things I do in the garden. This year, for example, I’ve got three good stands of peas working and potentially two good stands of beans, all of which need trellises. You can build trellises the fancy way, with fence posts and wire and all the nice things stores sell for such purposes, or you can work with what you have. I bought one ball of garden twine this year and then came up with other ideas. I suppose I can still afford garden twine, but I’ve gotten into the habit of thinking differently about money and other resources. Seems pointless to buy more metal fence posts when I have the steel tubes from a swimming pool frame laying on a shelf in the garage. They won’t suffice for trellis posts but I can drive them into the ground and use them for sockets.

garden trellises made of willow and twineI coppiced the willows out front this year, experimentally, hoping they’ll sprout bunches of useful willow shoots to harvest for baskets in August. A couple died in the hot dry weather last fall and the others needed cutting back. I buried some of the branches to start new trees but had a lot of willow stock left, so stout willow poles jammed into the swimming pool frame posts built the ends of my trellises.

A coil of wire I bought for some purpose I’ve now forgotten sufficed the top span of my trellises, and to fill in the row I used more willow poles, notching the top end with my side tomahawk so I could alternate pressure on the wire. One pole pushes up on the wire, the next pulls down. Keeps things taut and together and probably will hold up. The roll of garden twine filled in the vertical gaps in the first trellis and made neat horizontal guides as well. I lashed the vertical runs to the top wire with a lark’s head knot and fixed the twine to the ground with another short, notched willow stake.

By the time I finished the first trellis, I was running low of twine, and wasn’t feeling like it was really necessary to buy more. I had plenty of willow, so I doubled up the vertical willow stakes and had enough twine to make the horizontal runners on the second trellis. On the third trellis I’d run out of twine so I wove willow poles in and out of the trellis uprights and lashed them in place with bits of wire left over from last year.

The trellises seemed pretty limber for something that will have to endure summer thunderstorms, so I used what remained of the hundred yards of phone wire I brought here from Arkansas just because it seemed too useful to throw away and anchored each end of the trellis to opposite sides of the garden fence. When I ran out of phone wire, I used a stout willow pole lashed to the center of the third trellis, and lashed again to a willow stake. Seemed like a pretty strong system.

I’d saved the pipes I used to use for pipe clamps when I did cabinetwork, to use as supports for the row of beans, but had nothing left for what goes between them by that time. Last year I tried “rabbit fencing,” a plastic mesh designed to keep rabbits out of the garden. It hadn’t worked for that, since the rabbits just chewed their way through it, and it didn’t work well as trellising either. Groping vines got stuck in it and had to be carefully pried loose and redirected as long as the plants kept growing.

willow trellisBut I’d done some pruning on an old apple tree in the back corner of the yard in the winter, and pulled out some wild grapevine that also had seemed too good to throw away. I did throw it away once, then went back and pulled it out of the heap and stuffed it onto the front porch instead. I felt like it ought to be good for something. To build the last trellis I cut lengths of grapevine and lashed it to the pipes and one central willow pole. As an extravagance, I tied the vines in place with some of the last plastic cable ties I have around. Might as well use them, I guess. I will miss cable ties when civilization collapses, every bit as much as I will miss toilet paper. Cable ties and toilet paper might be the grandest inventions of our culture, viewed from a perspective of a thousand years from now.

The garden has an interesting look this year, filled with bits of old and pieces of new. The peas reach up to any of it, not caring where things came from, just doing what peas do.

This will probably be my last post here for awhile. As the financial situation gets tougher I have less time to spend on things that don’t yield either money, fuel or food. I’ve had some fun with this blog but I have to focus on those other things this summer. I have to follow the example of the peas, I guess, and reach up for what’s there, no matter what it is.

Jimmy Two Hats

Simple Fishing with the Shakespeare Wonderpole / Durango

fishing with telescoping pole

We put away the cane poles when we put away childish things, and that's a shame. Now we have the Wonderpole, so welcome home. Photo by C. Miles at Flickr.com; CC 2.0 license.

When fishing becomes all about the gear, I lose interest in fishing. To me, fishing should involve the least technology possible. I’ve gone through several cycles of fishing in my lifetime, and each peaked with an accumulation of specialized fishing gear that I just didn’t want any more. When I reach that point, I give my gear away to somebody with kids so they can addict the younger generation to fishing gear without spending as much money.

Not fishing is about as entertaining as fishing, on most days. Instead of hunting for fish, I get to observe fish and fish habitat, without all the pressure of wanting to actually catch something. It’s like hunting without carrying a rifle, anyone woodsman knows that if you go into a forest without firearms you’ll see an amazing amount of game. Everything comes out and stares at you. Go back the next day with a rifle and you won’t see a sign of any living, edible creature. Critters know what a rifle means.


I’ll lose commissions
by saying this, but the
Durango is the same pole
and cheaper at Walmart.

Rigging the Wonderpole or Durango — I thought I should clarify how this was done since most people don’t fish with cane poles any longer. The only line guide on the pole is a ring at the very tip. Tie the handle end of the fishing line to one end of the line cleat on the butt of the pole and wrap about fifty turns of line onto the cleat, just to give yourself some spare line for when that big fish breaks loose and you want to try again. The action of the Wonderpole is very limber so I rigged it with six-pound test line. If you catch a fish of three pounds I’d advise playing it into shore and not lifting it out with the pole, it’s a panfish rig and parts of it are comparable to an ultralight. When you’ve wound the line onto the cleat, open up the rod tube and find the tip of the pole. Unwind enough extra line to go the length of the extended pole and about six feet beyond — you can wrap it temporarily around the cleat while you’re finishing the rig and testing things. Run the line through the guide at the tip and tie a hook on the line end. Extend the pole and unwind the line as you go. The hook will keep it from falling back through the tip guide. If it looks good, you can finish playing with it and wind the line up again as you collapse the sections. Cap the base tube and run the hook through one of the hook keeper holes on the line cleat. Wind any slack onto the cleat to keep it all neat. You don’t need to take the line out of the tip guide for storage, the cap fits anyway.

When you reach your fishing spot, unwind some line, clamp a sinker on it, and set your bobber to hang the bait as deep as you want it. Then pay out line as you extend the sections of the pole. They don’t need to be really tight, just snugged together lightly. You want to be able to collapse the pole again without breaking it. I used a light sinker and bobber rig that barely took the slack out of the line still running along the pole, and the line did sag a lot when the rig hit the water, but it was workable. You can adjust that slack somewhat by winding line on the cleat, but you don’t want the pole tip to affect the bobber and the bait. You just want the tip ready to set the hook with a quick flick of the wrist. Too much slack line makes you miss strikes. Clean any dirt off the pole before you collapse the sections, or the next time you set it up, the sections will jam together somewhat permanently, a common problem with any telescoping pole.

With fish it’s a little different, and the change isn’t so much in the behavior of the fish as in your own behavior and your own perceptions, when you’re just observing and not concentrating on fishing. You lose the old rules and the old habits and start noticing the bigger picture. You notice new places that look like they’d be good fishing holes, instead of returning again and again to the places where you got lucky once or twice before. With a little time away from fishing, you start feeling like you could do it right next time.

So this time, going completely against the modern fishing trends, I’ve decided to start out with the simplest rig and tweak it until I find something perfect. I don’t want several hundred dollars worth of gear that I never use just taking up space in the boat. All I want is a pleasant day and some fish for supper. I sat myself down in front of the living window this past winter and set about making whatever simple gear I could make. There’s no reason not to do that. I made a stringer from a length of nylon cord and a bamboo chopstick. I made a couple of bobbers from some old corks and bamboo skewers. Looks like those things ought to work.


The six foot model is
lots easier to handle
and might not be in
stock at Walmart.

Sinkers and hooks are cheap. I bought the environmentally wise sinkers, in one size only, and a box of No. 4 panfish hooks. I’ve caught all sorts of things on No. 4 panfish hooks, and light crimp-on sinkers work about as well as any other type of rig. Light sinkers are as good as sliding sinkers if you’re fishing in still water. I’m recalling all the fishing hikes I went on, with a two pound load of assorted sinkers, only one size of which I ever used. If you might use it, you should probably leave it at home. Take the things you do use, instead.

I wondered whether I ought to buy a pole or make one from a willow branch or one of the local canes, but I wound up buying a collapsible panfish pole made by Shakespeare, partly because it seemed light and compact and partly because I wanted to know if it was any good. The Shakespeare Wonderpole, made of strong but light fiberglass sections, offers what seems to be the simplest approach to fishing that you can buy in a retail store. The Wonderpole sells through Amazon, and Shakespeare markets the same telescoping fiberglass pole through Walmart under the brand name Durango. You can get a Wonderpole or Durango in lengths from 6 feet to 20 feet. I settled for a 12 footer, long enough to drop lines into deeper offshore water but not so long it’s impossible to manipulate. More about the problems of tangled line and long poles in a moment.

My Durango has no reel seat, so I don’t need to worry about a reel. A bracket on the side of the pole’s butt section holds line. I padded the bracket with one turn of leather thong because I was a little concerned about six pound test line pinching off against the metal, but I doubt that’s a problem really. I’m not used to fishing without a reel and at first did not trust the situation at all. This is very old-style fishing, and all the finesse comes from the pole. You take up slack line by lifting the pole. You play the fish by dipping and raising the pole, because there’s no drag. That’s too simple! Where’s all the gear? Well, you don’t need all that gear. If you catch small fish, you just lift them out of the water and put them in your bucket. Larger fish that can break lines usually will do that unless you know how to play them, no matter what rig you’re using. You can’t let a fish run if all you have is a pole with no reel, and everything has to happen within that first small radius of fishing line you have out. The action of the pole does all the fancy work of playing the fish.

I set out on my test expedition with the Durango Wonderpole, equipped with line and a fanny pack partly filled with essentials and a tiny amount of stuff I will never use, like a camera and a GPS. I always think I might enjoy those but when I get out to the lake I’m only interested in fishing. Someday if I catch a fish that takes pictures and notes GPS coordinates I’ll actually use those things. OK, maybe next time I’ll take the camera in case I see a UFO fishing for carp or something, but I’ll leave the GPS at home. Otherwise, I had my hooks, my sinkers and homemade bobbers, a belt knife and multitool (for removing hooks from fish and for performing unexpected surgical tasks) and that’s that. Maybe some extra gear there, but it was a pretty minimal fishing kit, with no beer.

About a hundred feet down the lakeshore from the two middle-aged fisherwomen in bikinis and lawn chairs I found a nearly brand-new plastic bobber. Hey, free plastic bobber beats homemade free bobber, now I’m carrying extra bobbers. A hundred yards down the lake from the bikini women I remembered I didn’t have any bait. Hmm. Bait is something most fishermen bring along with them, but I haven’t carried bait since the 80′s. For me, part of fishing is finding what’s there. If I’m fishing a creek I net some minnows (requires more gear, of course) or overturn some rocks and catch crayfish and caddis fly larvae (requires time). If you don’t find bait, you can pretty much conclude you won’t find fish, either. Sometimes I have so much fun looking for bait I don’t get around to fishing.

With no pristine creek available I had to look elsewhere for bait, meaning the woods above the lake. On the way up I found an empty Vienna sausage can of just the perfect size for containing bait, so I brought that along. I didn’t find much of interest under rocks or logs on the open slopes, but when I hit the woods, overturning a couple of rotten logs exposed a dozen or so earthworms. Those cost about three dollars at the local bait shop. Later in the year the worms will be harder to find, but the cans are usually available for free, and any natural bait you find in the area you fish usually works lots better than bait from a jar or refrigerator.

I tried a few places where seating alongshore seemed comfortable, but of course had no luck there and moved on to a less friendly place where I could actually find fish. Sometimes you do get lucky in a human-friendly location, because of chance underwater structure like old cars and Christmas trees, but usually you’ll find fish in places where fish find food. I settled at the mouth of a tiny creek and fished the edge of the shade from the willow trees. With the float set at about four feet I had pretty good luck. Fish were holding just off the mouth of the creek, waiting for food to tumble down. I caught some of about everything, including catfish and carp and bluegill and bass. The little fish were as easy as little fish ever get, they’re expert at robbing hooks of bait but when you do hook them they just pop out of the water. The larger fish tested the rig a bit better, and I was impressed by the way the Durango responded to an 18-inch carp. Carp fight like hell and would be as popular as salmon if there was anything appealing about them in culinary terms. I only missed having a fishing reel a little bit, when I was playing with the carp. The fishing reel turned out to be unnecessary. That’s a little sad, because I like reels.

UPDATE! NEW CARP RECIPE DISCOVERED! — When I showed up at work this morning several of the fisherpeople there wanted to know if I’d had any luck, and I was pleased to report that I had. When Will, the grill cook at the restaurant, heard that I’d caught a carp I was surprised by his excitement. Usually people snicker when you mention you caught a carp. I was a little skeptical of Will, because of my experience with people who want to tell you a pine plank tastes better than a carp if you cook it properly, but Will has a recipe and his enthusiasm was clear. Clean the carp and slice out the dark “mud vein.” Soak the carp in salt water overnight, then cut into pieces and deep fry. Delicious, according to Will, and by the size of his eyes and his rapt expression I believe him to be correct. Will also concurs that carp are one of the best fighting fish you’ll ever encounter (except maybe snakeheads, coming soon to a river or lake near you).

I honestly think that if you’re concerned with saving ounces on a backpacking trip and taking minimal fishing gear, you’d be wise to take the Durango/Wonderpole from Shakespeare. It does work well, and it’s both light and compact. There are a few problems, but problems you can live with peacefully. The longer the pole is, the more trouble you will have with instantaneous tangles of fishing line. I was most impressed with the extremely complicated knots this bouncing rig created out of only a a couple of seconds of chaos. How a sinker and bobber rig manages to cause a knot with thirty-two convolutions in it on just two bounces is just beyond me, but this rig will do it.  You’d think that if you cut the reel out of the rig you wouldn’t have any more trouble with backlashes, but that’s not so. The longer the pole, the more bounce you get when you pull the line in to refresh the bait. If one part of the rig overlaps the line, the next part of the rig overlaps the part that overlapped the line, ad infinitum. Good luck with that 20 foot pole — keep the rigging simple.

Looking ahead, I won’t set the Durango/Wonderpole aside, because in Indiana I can fish with more than one rod and this one is simple and easy. But, I will be considering a basic rod and reel next. A medium-action rod and reel gives you more fishing distance and more varied options than a simple panfish pole. Probably will not catch more fish, but the options are entertaining. I like being able to cast and reel, even if I don’t catch fish. Sigh, it’s the beginning of that long old road to the boat full of hundreds of dollars of unused tackle. Maybe I can resist. For an ultralight trip, though, I’m going with the Durango. It’s the simplest choice of modern ultralight fishing poles. Heck, maybe I’ll just take the hook, sinker and line and make my own pole. The older I get, the farther back in time I travel.

Cookstoves That Burn Debris — for Backpackers and Mad Max Scenarios

I just finished updating my debris stove section at Jimmy’s Backpacking Page and find that I have even more to say about this interesting technology.  Maybe because we’re drifting ever closer to the mystical date of December 21st, 2012, I do see a lot more products that try to appeal to the end-of-the-world marketplace. I’m not totally convinced they are better ideas than campfires, even though they are vastly more efficient. I reviewed a few of these stoves on JBP (I like the Vargo Hexagon for backpacking purposes, simple and light) but there’s just so much more to say about the runners-up that I can’t stop there.

I suppose that part of the mystique of naturally-fueled stoves is the hypnotic effect of fire and the ritualistic aspect of fire-stoking. When I was a kid, my main chore other than slopping the hogs and feeding the cattle and horses was building and feeding the fire, and I liked the fire part best because there’s something both technical and savage about it. I got very good at building fires, so good that when my parents started leaving me at home alone occasionally I nearly burned the house down, twice. Although I’ve spent a lot of time around campfires, I gave them up except for occasional demonstrations (can’t build a fire today because everything’s wet? Let me give it a shot!) and instead, I use a Svea 123 that I bought in 1972. Kind of puzzles me that people think natural fires are better than a white gas blowtorch, but ok, let’s take a look.

Here’s an intriguing and well-designed debris stove: the Solhuma Vital Survival Stove, advertised as “designed to deliver life-saving heat in extreme situations.” Although I like this stove a lot, it isn’t actually designed for that. The Solhuma isn’t built for heating and would kill you if fired up inside a tent or a closed room. This is actually a cookstove, the equivalent of one burner of your current range top. The Solhuma weighs 1 1/2 pounds and takes up only 8 by 5 by 2 inches when folded. That’s a neat package and good enough for camping or backpacking if you’re not an ultralight enthusiast. Anything solid that burns can fuel the Solhuma, including dry animal dung, paper, cardboard, dry leaves and sticks. The stove generates a maximum of 20,000 BTU’s because two AA batteries power a small blower fan and intensify the burn.

That sounds pretty darn good, and in terms of debris stoves it is pretty darn good. Last winter I heated my house with a 15,000 BTU kerosene heater and on cold days I could sort of feel the warmth when I lit it. 20,000 BTU’s is useful warmth, but the Solhuma can’t provide that indoors due to smoke and carbon monoxide production. Don’t save your dried dung and expect to heat the house with it in emergency situations, because you’ll have to cook outside in the cold.

Realistically, the Solhuma isn’t going to work well on all fuels. The best fuels are going to be the things that people usually use in campfires like twigs and sticks, but if you get it going you can get good results from sawdust pellets and whole corn. After the world ends, you’ll probably want to eat your whole kernel corn instead of burning it, but pellet fuel in general will operate the Solhuma efficiently. If you decide to cook a meal using nothing but dried tree leaves, collect a massive pile of them first, because you’re going to be really busy stuffing dried leaves into the fire. Weight matters where fuel is concerned and if your fuel is mostly air you’re going to need a lot of it.

After December 21st, 2012, if the world does collapse upon us, you’ll get at least 35 hours of burn time from the Solhuma, because that’s as long it runs on two AA batteries. Stock up on those batteries, because we won’t be making any more after civilization collapses and without them, a skillfully built campfire outperforms the Solhuma Vital Survival Stove. Without the batteries, the Solhuma doesn’t work. It’s just a tiny fire that goes out.

Still, if civilization doesn’t collapse and you want a fairly lightweight cookstove for camping trips that will burn nearly anything you can shove into it, the Solhuma is a great thing to have around. Instead of a smoldering smoky fire, it makes a hot clean fire that cooks food quickly. Heck, you can probably burn pieces of your car in it if you get stuck in the mountains in the deep snow and want to make hot tea. How useful that is, well, make your own decision. Maybe you should take a sandwich instead.

As far as the end-of-the-world thing goes, I expect that at the end of the world you’ll have plenty of debris around and you won’t need to worry about running out of fuel for campfires. Most of civilization burns pretty good.